…By this sin they fell from their original righteousness, and communion with God, and so became dead in sin, and wholly defiled in all the faculties and parts of soul and body… (Westminster Confession of Faith, VI, 2)
COMMON GRACE ARGUMENT:
Defenders of common
grace sometimes hold that the Confession here describes total depravity as
merely a defilement of “every part” of man. That the unregenerated man and
woman are "totally depraved" merely means that there is depravity in every part of their being. Their mind
has some depravity or is affected somewhat by depravity. Their will has some
depravity or is somewhat affected by depravity. Their body has some depravity
or is somewhat affected by depravity. But there is also some good in their
mind, in their will, and in their body. Or, to say it differently, their mind, will,
and body are also affected by good—good that comes from God by the operation of the Holy
Spirit in common grace.
(I)
Prof. David J. Engelsma
[Source: The
Standard Bearer, Vol. 69, Issue 4]
The fact is that the WCF very definitely
states, not merely that the unregenerated man is depraved "in all the
faculties and parts of soul and body," but that he is "wholly
defiled" in every faculty and part. Every faculty, e.g., the will, and
every part, e.g., the brain, of all unregenerated sinners is completely
defiled. In every faculty and part is nothing else than defilement. There is no
good in any faculty or part of fallen man.
Also, [those who appeal to this article neglect] to call attention to what follows in this chapter in the WCF on total depravity:
From this original
corruption, whereby we are utterly indisposed, disabled, and
made opposite to all good, and wholly inclined to all evil, do proceed all actual
transgressions (6.4; emphasis mine, DJE).
What loophole is left . . . through which [one]
can introduce good into the unregenerate? . . . How is it possible to interpret
chapter six of the WCF as teaching merely defilement "in every faculty and
part"?
In light of the creed's describing the condition of the unregenerated sinner as that of death ("dead in sin, and wholly defiled," etc.), there is something absurd, something ludicrous, about the notion that this sinner is yet somewhat good and, therefore, capable of doing good works. The teaching that unregenerated men are somewhat good requires us to believe . . . that dead men are also somewhat alive. Indeed, the dead men are somewhat alive in every faculty and part.
Were I to assert such nonsense in the physical realm of everyday life, I would be dismissed as a fool. "My Uncle Harry is dead, and he has some life yet in soul and body so that he is working quite actively." But in the realm of Presbyterian and Reformed theology, this passes for great wisdom. "The unregenerated is dead in sin, and he has some ethical life so that he is vigorously producing good works."
-------------------------------------------------------
(II)
More to come! (DV)
No comments:
Post a Comment