Chapter Six
Conclusion
It may well be that Davenant was a gifted man and
that in many respects he contributed to the spiritual life of the Church of
England. However, given the result of his teaching and that of men like Amyraut
on the extent of the atonement it is difficult to perceive of him as a true
Jewel of the Reformation.
The views of Davenant and Amyraut continue to
plague the Reformed community. Indeed, the pendulum has swung so far that the
doctrine of limited or particular atonement is being constantly assailed even
from within the Reformed camp. Just as it was in the days of Davenant and
Amyraut, men dislike that doctrine because it does not accord with their
perception of a loving God who desires the salvation of all men. Therefore, it
is disparaged and ridiculed.
The result of such views is to destroy the truth
of substitutionary atonement and, at the same time, to deny the efficacy of our
Savior’s atonement. One might well ponder how it is that Christ could die on
Calvary for the sins of all men, but yet not all men are saved? How can that
be? It can only be, if Christ did not truly die for sin and if His atonement
was of no worth. A serious error? It is difficult to perceive of an error more
central to the work of Jesus Christ as the Mediator and Head of the Covenant.
The observation of John Owen regarding the impact
of Arminianism in his day could equally be applied to the doctrine of limited
atonement in this present age. Owen said:
The fate of our church
having of late devolved the government thereof into the hands of men tainted
with this poison, Arminianism became backed with powerful arguments of praise
and preferment, and quickly prevailed to beat poor naked truth into a corner.82
Sadly, in our day the poor naked truth of the
limited and particular atonement of our Savior Jesus Christ has been beaten
into a corner. Nonetheless, it is the teaching of the Word of God and it is the
means by which God’s people can be assured that their sins have been blotted
out. This truth is one of great comfort for the child of God.
------------------
FOOTNOTES:
FOOTNOTES:
81. Davenant, On
the Controversy, p. 568.
No comments:
Post a Comment