21 April, 2017

II Corinthians 6:1-2—“… receive not the grace of God in vain … behold, now is the accepted time; behold, now is the day of salvation”


We then, as workers together with him, beseech you also that ye receive not the grace of God in vain. (For he saith, I have heard thee in a time accepted, and in the day of salvation have I succoured thee: behold, now is the accepted time; behold, now is the day of salvation) (II Cor. 6:1-2).


WELL-MEANT OFFER / FREE OFFER ARGUMENT:
This passage is used to support the “general, well-meant offer” (or “free offer”) of the gospel—the teaching that God sincerely and earnestly desires, wills, wishes or wants all persons that outwardly hear the preaching to be saved and, in the preaching of the gospel, offers grace and salvation (along with all its blessings) to each and every hearer for their acceptance or rejection.


(I)

Prof. Herman C. Hanko

(a)

[Source: Covenant Reformed News, vol. XVI, issue 16 (August 2017)]

Question 1: “According to II Corinthians 6:1, it is possible to receive grace ‘in vain.’ Does not this imply that a reprobate or a false convert can at least receive grace, even though it is in vain?”

No, it certainly does not mean that an unbeliever receives grace. The point is that God saves a number of people and that group becomes a congregation of Jesus Christ. Upon that congregation, God sends the blessings of His grace. They grow in grace and in the knowledge of the truth. God is gracious to that church as a body.

It almost always happens that there are also those in the congregation who are not true believers. They confess the truth for a while. They may even be chosen as office-bearers. But they are not faithful. Hebrews 6:1-6 speaks of such people. And so the warning is pertinent and needed.

There is also the carnal seed born in the church who do not show their ungodly colours until they become young people or confessing adults.

The grace God gives to a congregation creates a sphere of Christ’s gracious workings in saving His church. The congregation as a whole and each individual in it is called not to use this grace of God in vain.

Everyone knows that, when a farmer irrigates his field, he waters weeds, as well as his crop. But the weeds receive the water in vain. Indeed, the watering causes them to grow rapidly and manifest themselves as weeds. So it is in the church. Hebrews 6:7-8 uses this figure too.


Question 2: “When Paul writes in II Corinthians 6:2, ‘Behold, now is the accepted time; behold, now is the day of salvation,’ is he not implying (a) that salvation is available to all who hear, and (b) that their receiving of it depends upon their response to this message, and (c) that God, through the apostle’s beseeching, is Himself expressing an ardent desire for all to respond immediately and be saved?”

For some strange reason that I will never understand, the phrase “now is the accepted time,” along with “now is the day of salvation,” is interpreted to mean that an invitation of the gospel is addressed on that very day to those listening, and that, if they do not do something about it and accept Christ, they will lose all opportunity to be saved. This interpretation is a favourite of Arminian evangelists who want to scare people into believing—something they find profitable to do for they believe that a man’s final salvation depends on the choice of his own will and not on God’s sovereign power to save whom He will. What nonsense!

The apostle refers in II Corinthians 6:2 to the entire new dispensation. With the coming of Christ and His glorious work, salvation now comes through Christ’s power to gather His church from all nations on the earth. It is no longer limited to the Jewish nation, where the saints knew the gospel through types and shadows. I might add that, after all, “one day is with the Lord as a thousand years, and a thousand years as one day” (II Pet. 3:8). Today, as well as when the apostle wrote these words, is the day of salvation. It is always, in the new dispensation, the day of salvation.

At the same time, God confronts everyone who hears the gospel with His solemn and urgent command to repent of their sins, believe in the Lord Jesus Christ and be saved. So the church is ordered to preach the gospel that God saves sinners through faith in Jesus Christ, and ministers are called to command all to repent, turn from their sinful way and believe on Christ. The command to all to repent is “serious,” as Canons of Dordt III/IV:8 expresses it. God is earnest and not playing games when He commands all who hear the gospel to repent and to believe in His Son.


Question 3: “Most commentators believe that II Corinthians 6:2 teaches that the grace of God spoken of in the text means the gracious offer of the gospel—an offer of reconciliation and pardon, which can be accepted or rejected. What can be said about this?”

Those commentators are wrong. Those who defend an ineffectual divine wish to save the reprobate are guilty of blaspheming Him by insisting that He is unable to save those whom He desires to save. Let us hold fast to the truth and give glory to God.


(b)

[Source: Covenant Reformed News, vol. 17, no. 22 (Feb. 2020) and 23 (Mar. 2020)]

Question 2: “II Corinthians 5:19-20 and 6:1-2 speak of the apostles (and, by extension, the church) being entrusted with the ‘word of reconciliation.’ The passage says that we are to ‘beseech’ men to be ‘reconciled to God.’ Preachers are called ‘ambassadors’ who pray in ‘Christ’s stead,’ pleading for his hearers ‘to receive not the grace of God in vain’ and informing them that ‘now is the day of salvation.’ How are we to understand these verses without referring to a well-meant offer of grace and reconciliation through Christ on the part of God to all who outwardly hear the gospel?”
      
This question brings us to the heart of the issue, the preaching of the gospel, and must be carefully considered.
      
The first point that must be made is that the heresy of the well-meant gospel offer confuses a command of God to all men to believe in Christ with a gracious offer to everybody. The Bible has many commands to all who hear the gospel, for they must forsake sin and believe in Christ.
      
It seems to me that this distinction is, as my seminary professor was wont to say, as clear as the sun in the heavens. I cannot see why anyone not bent on teaching heresy can possibly confuse God’s command to believe with a loving offer to the reprobate of an available salvation that He will give to him if only he believes. The only sense one can make of it is a denial of total depravity: man can of his own power of will accept the offer Christ makes to them. A denial of total depravity is a fatal error that ultimately destroys the whole truth of sovereign grace.
      
Wherever we preach the gospel, we are commanded to confront everyone with the command to believe. We tell them that they are under solemn obligation to trust in Christ or else they will earn for themselves everlasting hell. It is a fact that God is in dead earnest when He tells man that he must trust in Christ crucified and risen.
      
The reason why God commands all men to believe is this: He created man capable of perfect obedience. Man’s loss of the ability to believe is not God’s fault but man’s own fault. God is just and still requires that men obey Him; His command is that man, even in his fallen state, obey God. God does not say, as it were, “Oh, you poor man. You disobeyed me but that’s alright. I still love you and I will save you, if you want to be saved.”

The Heidelberg Catechism faces this question already in Lord’s Day 4: “Doth not God then do injustice to man, by requiring from him in His law that which he cannot perform?” The Catechism tells us that this is not true for the Most High is just. The sinner must still do what God commands.
      
In The Triple Knowledge, his commentary on the Heidelberg Catechism, Herman Hoeksema uses an apt illustration. It goes like this. I contract with a builder to build me a house. He wants his money before starting the project and I give it to him. If he takes this cash, squanders it on an around-the-world cruise with his family and comes back broke, he is still under obligation to build me a house. If he refuses to do the job, pleading a lack of money, I may take him to court so that he fulfils his promise. He may not plead inability, for I made him able to build the house. By his sin, he put himself in a position that he cannot do it. Certainly, that sin of his does not release him from his obligation.
      
The Synod of Dordt, in its battle against the Arminians of its day, who also taught a well-meant offer of the gospel rooted in an alleged divine love for all men, specifically enjoined upon the Reformed churches the calling to preach the gospel of the cross to all men with two parts to that gospel: (1) everyone who hears the gospel is under solemn obligation to believe in Christ and (2) the promise of salvation is that God will save all who believe.
      
I am not fond of the word “plead,” which the questioner uses (although the text does not use it) but God is serious when He commands men to believe in Christ. He is not playing games; He is not “teasing” men; He is not playing a joke. It is the will of His command that man do indeed believe in Christ. God, after all, created him in such a way that he was capable of obeying God in all things. God does not ever release him from this solemn obligation. The decisions of the Synod of Dordt make this clear too. They can be found in Canons III/IV:8-9.
  
[ … ]
  
… The defenders of the gospel as a loving offer to everybody head for head confuse the command of the gospel with a mere offer. This is inexcusable exegesis. Even in every-day speech, who confuses an offer with a command?
      
… In [II Corinthians 5:20], Paul says that, as an ambassador of the gospel of Christ, he “beseeches” the Corinthians to be “reconciled to God” through faith in Jesus. The offer defenders appeal to the word “beseech.” On that word and similar words in Scripture, they hang their doctrinal error of God’s universal love and tender plea to absolutely everyone to believe in Christ.

… [W]ords similar to the word “beseech” indicate the seriousness of God’s command that comes to all men to believe in Christ. God means what He says when He commands all men to forsake sin and believe in the gospel. He does not play games. Several remarks must be added to this.
      
Historically, the Reformed churches have always made a distinction between the will of God’s command and the will of God’s decree. The doctrine of election and reprobation belongs to the will of God’s decree; the will of God’s command is that all men forsake their sin and believe in Christ. Yet the will of God’s command is related to the will of His decree, for the will of His command is the means God uses to execute the will of His decree of reprobation so that reprobation is accomplished by God in the way of wicked man’s rejection of the gospel. The doctrine of a well-meant offer to all, rooted in an alleged divine desire to save everybody, has crowded out the doctrine of sovereign double predestination. This refusal to believe the truth of divine predestination is not only rooted in its inherent conflict with the idea of a well-meant offer, but historically those who hold tenaciously to a well-meant offer of the gospel have denied, or ended up denying, double predestination.
      
Such has been the nature of the preaching of the gospel throughout history—even in the Old Testament times. Even then, the gospel always came with the command to forsake sin and believe the promise of God that He would send the Seed of the woman, Jesus Christ.
      
And so God has worked through the ages. The gospel was preached to the organism of the nation of Israel, including elect and reprobate. The gospel was always the same: it included an urgent command to all who heard it to repent of their sins and believe in the Lord Jesus Christ—in the old dispensation, to believe in the promise of the coming of Christ as the Seed of the woman. But that command, preached to the organism of the nation, came to the elect as well as the reprobate, for the elect had to repent and believe the promise of Christ, as well as the reprobate. That was the command of God that came to all.
      
But along with that command came also the promise that whoever believed in Christ would receive eternal life in Him. That promise too came to all who heard the gospel. Those who rejected God’s command and scorned His promise were damned; those who believed the promise, forsook their sin and repented were saved.
      
So it is also in the new dispensation. In the organism of the church, this is always the command of the gospel: repent and believe! Never is that gospel to be reduced to a mere loving offer to all men absolutely, for that is a caricature of the gospel, and does terrible despite to the only true and sovereign God.
      
From God‘s point of view, the true preaching of the gospel that I have described is the means He uses to accomplish His purpose of election and reprobation, for the gospel is “the power of God unto salvation” to all who believe (Rom. 1:16). God gives the gift of faith to His elect whom He knows eternally as His own (John 17:9). Whereas, He hardens the reprobate who reject the gospel and mock His command to repent.
      
God works in this way because He does not treat men as robots, so that the elect believe because God pushes the right button. My minister used to say that God does not take the elect to heaven in the top bunk of a Pullman sleeper. He works in them so that they actually do believe. Nor does God work in the reprobate in such a way that they reject the gospel because God compels them to reject it. Adam was created capable of doing all the things that God commanded him, but he rebelled and now his descendants show their wicked rebellion by turning their backs on Jehovah and remaining in the slime of sin.
      
The figure that Scripture uses to explain this truth is found in Isaiah 55:10-11 and Hebrews 6:7-8. It is the figure of rain that falls on the earth, and waters both herbs and weeds. The rain is responsible for the herbs bearing food and it is responsible for the growth of the weeds so that they manifest themselves as weeds. The same is true of our Lord’s teaching in the parable of the four kinds of soil, and the parable of the wheat and tares (Matt. 13:3-30, 36-43).
      
Yet it must also be remembered that the gospel is preached to an organism, whether a nation, a church or a family. Hence, in John 15:1-8, Jesus compares the nation of Israel to branches. Christ Himself is the vine and God is the husbandman. There are branches in the vine that bear fruit and there are branches that do not bear fruit. The latter are those who do not turn from their wicked way (in Jesus’ day, particularly worshipping God in outward and formal law-keeping to gain salvation by the works of the law). The former are those who confess that only by faith in Christ can they be saved (in Jesus’ day, Nicodemus, the Marys, the disciples, the thief on the cross, etc.).


-----------------------------------------------

(II)

Prof. David J. Engelsma


THREE QUESTIONS:

Q. 1. “According to verse 1, it says that it’s possible to receive grace “in vain.” Does this not imply that a reprobate or a false convert can at least “receive grace,” even though it be in vain?

Q. 2. “When Paul writes, ‘Behold, now is the accepted time; behold, now is the day of salvation,’ is he not implying that salvation is (a) available for all who hear, (b) that their receiving of it depends upon their response to this, and (c) that God, through the apostles' “beseeching,” is Himself expressing an ardent desire for all to immediately respond and be saved?”

Q. 3. “Most commentators believe that the grace of God spoken of in the text, means the gracious offer of reconciliation and pardon, which can be accepted or rejected. What can be said about this?”


First, the exhortation that the Corinthians not receive the grace of God in vain does not imply that this is possible in the sense that a man is the recipient of the grace of God, but perishes. In light of verse 2, the apostle is exhorting the church not to receive the gospel that Paul preached in vain in the sense that the gospel of grace came to it, but the church did not believe it or hold on to it. This is a possibility, indeed a reality in many cases. The church and its members are therefore guilty of having the gospel brought to them, but, by their unbelief, not benefiting from the gospel. This implies neither a frustration of gracious purposes of God, nor a falling from grace on the part of individuals.
   
Regarding your second question, whenever the gospel is preached the ministers beseech, or ardently exhort, the hearers to receive the gospel, that is, believe it and embrace it. Salvation is brought near to all who hear in the sense that whoever believes will be saved by the gospel. Receiving the gospel is by faith. The implication is that whoever believes will receive the gospel and salvation. But there is no implication that believing depends upon an alleged ability to believe in the hearers. Scripture rather denies that faith lies in the natural ability of the hearer. Faith is the gift of God. As for “beseeching,” the meaning is an urgent call regarding a life or death matter for the hearers. There is no teaching or even implication of a desire on the part of God that all hearers receive the gospel and be saved. First, it is the workers, not God, who do the beseeching in the passage. Even with regard to the call of God to receive the gospel, this is the will of His command, not the will of His good pleasure. God commands certain things as the duty of the hearer that He does not purpose in His counsel. He urgently commanded (besought, if you will) Pharaoh to let His people go, but He decreed that the king would not let the people go, so that God might make His power known in the king’s refusal.
   
The implication of the explanation the third question proposes is that all hearers of the preaching of the gospel have the ability to receive the gospel. How is this to be squared with the doctrine of total depravity? Also, if this is true, salvation depends upon the sinner. How does this harmonize with salvation by grace? In addition, if God sincerely desires the salvation of all who hear, this contradicts His will of predestination. It also makes God powerless to save, and makes salvation depend on the will of the sinner. Grace is at stake.
   
This is the answer also to your third question. The text teaches the reality and urgency of the external call to salvation by preachers: a beseeching of all to repent and believe, and in this way, to be saved.  The gospel calls all hearers to believe and instructs all hearers that all who believe will be saved. There is no teaching in the text that all are able to believe or that salvation depends on the will of the sinner. The question begs the question whether all hearers have the natural ability to repent and believe. Ephesians 2 describes all to whom the gospel comes as “dead in sin.” Dead sinners do not have the ability to do what the gospel calls them to do. When one does what the gospel calls him to do, namely, believe, this is because of the particular grace of God to him: “By grace are ye saved, through faith, and this [faith] is not of yourselves, it is the gift of God” (Eph. 2).
   
To use the language of Ezekiel, when God passes by the dead infant weltering in his blood and says, “Live!” the exhortation does not imply that the dead child has the ability to do so. With the call to the elect, God gives the efficacious grace to obey the call. According to His reprobation, He withholds this grace from the others to whom the external call also comes. The reprobate is responsible for rejecting the call, even though he has no ability to heed it. It is his fault that he is in his desperate spiritual condition.


-----------------------------------------------

(III)

John Gill (1697-1771)

[Source: Exposition of the Entire Bible]

[Note: Gill speaks of the minister’s of the church as those who might receive the grace of God in vain, (i.e., the ministry or teaching of the gospel of grace), and not so much the church as a whole.]

“we beseech you also”; you ministers also; as we have entreated the members of the church, to be reconciled to the order of the Gospel, and the laws of Christ in his house, so as fellow labourers with you, and jointly concerned in the same embassy of peace, we beseech you the ministers of the word in this church, that ye receive not the grace of God in vain: by “the grace of God,” is not meant the grace of God in regeneration, and effectual calling, which can never be received in vain; for the grace of God never fails of producing a thorough work of conversion; nor is it ever lost, but is strictly connected with eternal, glory: but by it is meant either the doctrine of grace, the Gospel of Christ, so called, because it is a declaration of the love and grace of God to sinners, ascribes salvation in part, and in whole, to the free grace of God, and is a means of implanting and increasing grace in the hearts of men. Now this may be received in vain by ministers and people, when it is but notionally received, or received in word only: when it is abused and perverted to vile purposes, and when men drop, deny it, and fall off from it; or else by the grace of God may be designed gifts of grace, qualifying for ministerial service; and the sense of the exhortation be, that they be careful that the gifts bestowed on them might not be neglected by them, but be used and improved to the advantage of the church, and the glory of Christ; by giving up themselves to study, meditation, and prayer, by labouring constantly in the word and doctrine, and by having a strict regard to their lives and conversations, “that the ministry be not blamed”; which exhortation he pursues in, and by his own example and others …


-----------------------------------------------

(IV)

Robert Hawker (1753-1827)

[Source: “The True Gospel, no Yea and Nay Gospel,” quoted in The Standard Bearer, vol. 11, no. 6 (December 15, 1934), pp. 138-139]

And what is the yea and nay gospel?—Truly it is much easier to say what it is not, than to tell what it is. For a yea and nay gospel is, in fact, no gospel at all. It is everlastingly made up of may-be’s and if-be’s. It is altogether conditional, and therefore must of necessity leave the whole in the final event to a peradventure. It doth not rest upon God’s will, but upon man’s pleasure. It is not founded in divine appointment, but in the result of human attainment. Not in what God’s grace is, but in what man’s merit shall be. And of consequence, according to this state of things, the whole is left at the last to an uncertainty which shall prevail: God’s power or man’s; the Lord’s counsel or man’s works. A precarious sample this of a yea and nay gospel.

Moreover, all the principles of a yea and nay gospel are in correspondence with those outlines of the system. A yea and nay gospel takes for granted that all men are alike in a salvable state; neither can any man fail of salvation but from his neglect of the opportunity at one time or other afforded him. And if a man seeks for acceptance before God, partly by faith and partly by good works, he is certain of happiness. Christ is made, by the yea and nay gospel, nothing more than a procuring cause. So that if a man so far makes use of Christ as by him to seek out his own salvation in the exercises of faith, and repentance, and good works, he doth all that is required of him, and Christ will make up the deficiency. The improvement of this opportunity with such men is the sure way of salvation; and by the neglect of it a man, according to their creed, may be lost. In those ups and downs, those hopes and fears, the principles of a yea and nay gospel consist. And thus living at an uncertainty; such men die at an uncertainty; and they go out of the world as they came into it, at a peradventure, concerning the one thing needful.

And the advocates of a yea and nay gospel, all act in perfect conformity to those principles. The preachers of it are continually holding forth a motley religion which they call the gospel, made up of law and gospel, faith and good works. Were it not for the awfulness of the subject, a man might smile to hear what very wooing and wining the words are made use of by them to gain upon the hearts of their hearers by human persuasion. Offers of Christ, yea pressing Christ upon the congregation, are the chief topics adopted. And sometimes, from the great earnestness with which they have worked up their natural feeling to persuade, they enforce the present opportunity as if, should it be neglected, never another perhaps may be afforded them. And not unfrequently they call into aid that blessed scripture of the Holy Ghost which the apostle Paul hath given the church in a very different sense from what those men use it: ‘For he saith, I have heard thee in a time accepted, and in the day of salvation I have succoured thee. Behold now is the day of salvation.’


-----------------------------------------------

(V)

More to come! (DV)







No comments:

Post a Comment